Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Premier League Thread
Football Banter 24-7 > Sports Discussion > General Football Discussion
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76
Nufc Navan
QUOTE(Some like it Hottiger @ May 15 2011, 05:56 PM) *

Wonder how many of Wigan's points this season can be attributed to N'Zogbia.

And McCarthy.

What an absolute fuck up by West Ham.

Looks like Robbie Keane is going back to Spurs AGAIN. bbc laugh.gif
Dorty Mag
Karen Brady, Sir Geoff Hurst, Avram Grant, Sir Trevor Brooking, the ICF, Tony Cottee, Alan Devonshire, Alf Garnett, David Sullivan, Glenn Roeder, the little shit who wears the Russian hat and military uniform, Scotty Parker, even Sir Bobby Moore......your boys took one hell of a beating bbc laugh.gif
BoredinKuwait
Fuckin' hell. bbc laugh.gif
Copy Nooker
Slightly boring Wigan getting the goal, but glad to see West Ham down.
So its like this:
If Rovers win against Wolves they're safe.
If Rovers draw against Wolves then all three of the teams on 39 pts have to win to put Rovers down.
If Rovers lose to Wolves then two of those teams have to win to put Rovers down.
I'm not worried. sad.gif
Black country toon
I would love it if all 5 teams won next week, it would be quality entertainment!
Dorty Mag
QUOTE(Black country toon @ May 15 2011, 06:06 PM) *

I would love it if all 5 teams won next week, it would be quality entertainment!



It's just a pity they can't all be relegated laugh.gif
Zoolander
West ham fans relegation for their chants at roeder. They can go and blow their bubbles at Brighton next year. The prem will not miss them
Copy Nooker
Now I'm off for the Big One - Ice-hockey World Championship final: Finland versus Sweden!!!!
popcorn.gif
Big Bad Titus
QUOTE(magtillidie @ May 15 2011, 05:54 PM) *

QUOTE(Some like it Hottiger @ May 15 2011, 05:13 PM) *

QUOTE(BoredinKuwait @ May 15 2011, 05:10 PM) *

QUOTE(Dorty Mag @ May 15 2011, 05:04 PM) *

QUOTE(BoredinKuwait @ May 15 2011, 05:01 PM) *

QUOTE(magtillidie @ May 15 2011, 04:55 PM) *

How much longer have Arsenal got to be shit before Wengers position comes into question, it seems as if sacking him is unthinkable to Arsenal, before today the've drawn 4 and lost 3 at the Emirates and when you look at some of the games:

Arsenal 2 v 3 WBA - they were 3 down
Arsenal 0 v 1 Newcastle biggrin.gif
Arsenal 2 v 3 Spurs - Arsenal were 2 up at half time
Arsenal 0 v 0 Sunderland - whilst Sunderland were on a terrible run
Arsenal 0 v 0 Blackburn - as per previous game Blackburn had been woeful
Arsenal 1 v 1 Liverpool - take the lead in the 98th only to go donw the other end and conced a penalty

Then there is the blowing a 4-0 lead at Newcastle as well as a few other dodgy results on the road.

Certainly not the results of a team that should be competing for the title, Man Utd have been shit on the road this season but all of these stupid results from Arsenal has allowed Man Utd to get away with it

Aye, he's got a terrible record and look at the amount of money he's spent compared to the other big clubs. Shocking.



He hasn't won anything for six years, I believe. Time must be running out for Wenger.

We haven't won anything for... It's just not that easy to win things. He should have spent on key positions last summer. But how much has the relatively low expenditure in recent seasons been down to the new stadium's expenses? I don't know.... maybe he's just got too stubborn about spending. A dominant central defender and it could have been a lot more interesting this season.
I think they've got money to spend, but Wenger refuses to spend big - or rather, he won't spend more than he thinks a player is worth, especially if that player is a defensive midfielder or a goalkeeper.


Exactly, no trophies in 6 years and he seems too stubborn to change his ways, he only wants to play 1 style of football which is great if you have the players like Barcelona to pull it off, but he just sticks with the same players that let him down all the time and has no plan B when many teams have now found out how to contain Arsenal. It's been obvious for a few years where they need to improve and he has had the money available to him to spend but he just won't spend it.


Six years without a trophy, my heart bleeds bbc laugh.gif

I agree he maybe needs to change his ways slightly, be less stubborn and make a few changes but there is no way on earth they should get rid of him after what he has done. Who would they get in to replace him that would do any better?

If I were them I would flog Fabregas in the summer for £50 million if they can get it, he clearly hasnt wanted to be there 100% for about the last 3 years. Then reinvest part or all of that in 3 or 4 good players and they will be right up their challenging next season.
Copy Nooker
QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ May 15 2011, 05:17 PM) *

QUOTE(magtillidie @ May 15 2011, 05:54 PM) *

QUOTE(Some like it Hottiger @ May 15 2011, 05:13 PM) *

QUOTE(BoredinKuwait @ May 15 2011, 05:10 PM) *

QUOTE(Dorty Mag @ May 15 2011, 05:04 PM) *

QUOTE(BoredinKuwait @ May 15 2011, 05:01 PM) *

QUOTE(magtillidie @ May 15 2011, 04:55 PM) *

How much longer have Arsenal got to be shit before Wengers position comes into question, it seems as if sacking him is unthinkable to Arsenal, before today the've drawn 4 and lost 3 at the Emirates and when you look at some of the games:

Arsenal 2 v 3 WBA - they were 3 down
Arsenal 0 v 1 Newcastle biggrin.gif
Arsenal 2 v 3 Spurs - Arsenal were 2 up at half time
Arsenal 0 v 0 Sunderland - whilst Sunderland were on a terrible run
Arsenal 0 v 0 Blackburn - as per previous game Blackburn had been woeful
Arsenal 1 v 1 Liverpool - take the lead in the 98th only to go donw the other end and conced a penalty

Then there is the blowing a 4-0 lead at Newcastle as well as a few other dodgy results on the road.

Certainly not the results of a team that should be competing for the title, Man Utd have been shit on the road this season but all of these stupid results from Arsenal has allowed Man Utd to get away with it

Aye, he's got a terrible record and look at the amount of money he's spent compared to the other big clubs. Shocking.



He hasn't won anything for six years, I believe. Time must be running out for Wenger.

We haven't won anything for... It's just not that easy to win things. He should have spent on key positions last summer. But how much has the relatively low expenditure in recent seasons been down to the new stadium's expenses? I don't know.... maybe he's just got too stubborn about spending. A dominant central defender and it could have been a lot more interesting this season.
I think they've got money to spend, but Wenger refuses to spend big - or rather, he won't spend more than he thinks a player is worth, especially if that player is a defensive midfielder or a goalkeeper.


Exactly, no trophies in 6 years and he seems too stubborn to change his ways, he only wants to play 1 style of football which is great if you have the players like Barcelona to pull it off, but he just sticks with the same players that let him down all the time and has no plan B when many teams have now found out how to contain Arsenal. It's been obvious for a few years where they need to improve and he has had the money available to him to spend but he just won't spend it.


Six years without a trophy, my heart bleeds bbc laugh.gif

I agree he maybe needs to change his ways slightly, be less stubborn and make a few changes but there is no way on earth they should get rid of him after what he has done. Who would they get in to replace him that would do any better?

If I were them I would flog Fabregas in the summer for £50 million if they can get it, he clearly hasnt wanted to be there 100% for about the last 3 years. Then reinvest part or all of that in 3 or 4 good players and they will be right up their challenging next season.

There's been a lot of talk about them coming in for Chris Samba.
He would certainly beaf up there defence.
Big Bad Titus
QUOTE(Copy Nooker @ May 15 2011, 06:24 PM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ May 15 2011, 05:17 PM) *

QUOTE(magtillidie @ May 15 2011, 05:54 PM) *

QUOTE(Some like it Hottiger @ May 15 2011, 05:13 PM) *

QUOTE(BoredinKuwait @ May 15 2011, 05:10 PM) *

QUOTE(Dorty Mag @ May 15 2011, 05:04 PM) *

QUOTE(BoredinKuwait @ May 15 2011, 05:01 PM) *

QUOTE(magtillidie @ May 15 2011, 04:55 PM) *

How much longer have Arsenal got to be shit before Wengers position comes into question, it seems as if sacking him is unthinkable to Arsenal, before today the've drawn 4 and lost 3 at the Emirates and when you look at some of the games:

Arsenal 2 v 3 WBA - they were 3 down
Arsenal 0 v 1 Newcastle biggrin.gif
Arsenal 2 v 3 Spurs - Arsenal were 2 up at half time
Arsenal 0 v 0 Sunderland - whilst Sunderland were on a terrible run
Arsenal 0 v 0 Blackburn - as per previous game Blackburn had been woeful
Arsenal 1 v 1 Liverpool - take the lead in the 98th only to go donw the other end and conced a penalty

Then there is the blowing a 4-0 lead at Newcastle as well as a few other dodgy results on the road.

Certainly not the results of a team that should be competing for the title, Man Utd have been shit on the road this season but all of these stupid results from Arsenal has allowed Man Utd to get away with it

Aye, he's got a terrible record and look at the amount of money he's spent compared to the other big clubs. Shocking.



He hasn't won anything for six years, I believe. Time must be running out for Wenger.

We haven't won anything for... It's just not that easy to win things. He should have spent on key positions last summer. But how much has the relatively low expenditure in recent seasons been down to the new stadium's expenses? I don't know.... maybe he's just got too stubborn about spending. A dominant central defender and it could have been a lot more interesting this season.
I think they've got money to spend, but Wenger refuses to spend big - or rather, he won't spend more than he thinks a player is worth, especially if that player is a defensive midfielder or a goalkeeper.


Exactly, no trophies in 6 years and he seems too stubborn to change his ways, he only wants to play 1 style of football which is great if you have the players like Barcelona to pull it off, but he just sticks with the same players that let him down all the time and has no plan B when many teams have now found out how to contain Arsenal. It's been obvious for a few years where they need to improve and he has had the money available to him to spend but he just won't spend it.


Six years without a trophy, my heart bleeds bbc laugh.gif

I agree he maybe needs to change his ways slightly, be less stubborn and make a few changes but there is no way on earth they should get rid of him after what he has done. Who would they get in to replace him that would do any better?

If I were them I would flog Fabregas in the summer for £50 million if they can get it, he clearly hasnt wanted to be there 100% for about the last 3 years. Then reinvest part or all of that in 3 or 4 good players and they will be right up their challenging next season.

There's been a lot of talk about them coming in for Chris Samba.
He would certainly beaf up there defence.


Think he is exactly the type of player they need to be honest.
Dorty Mag
QUOTE(Copy Nooker @ May 15 2011, 06:24 PM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ May 15 2011, 05:17 PM) *

QUOTE(magtillidie @ May 15 2011, 05:54 PM) *

QUOTE(Some like it Hottiger @ May 15 2011, 05:13 PM) *

QUOTE(BoredinKuwait @ May 15 2011, 05:10 PM) *

QUOTE(Dorty Mag @ May 15 2011, 05:04 PM) *

QUOTE(BoredinKuwait @ May 15 2011, 05:01 PM) *

QUOTE(magtillidie @ May 15 2011, 04:55 PM) *

How much longer have Arsenal got to be shit before Wengers position comes into question, it seems as if sacking him is unthinkable to Arsenal, before today the've drawn 4 and lost 3 at the Emirates and when you look at some of the games:

Arsenal 2 v 3 WBA - they were 3 down
Arsenal 0 v 1 Newcastle biggrin.gif
Arsenal 2 v 3 Spurs - Arsenal were 2 up at half time
Arsenal 0 v 0 Sunderland - whilst Sunderland were on a terrible run
Arsenal 0 v 0 Blackburn - as per previous game Blackburn had been woeful
Arsenal 1 v 1 Liverpool - take the lead in the 98th only to go donw the other end and conced a penalty

Then there is the blowing a 4-0 lead at Newcastle as well as a few other dodgy results on the road.

Certainly not the results of a team that should be competing for the title, Man Utd have been shit on the road this season but all of these stupid results from Arsenal has allowed Man Utd to get away with it

Aye, he's got a terrible record and look at the amount of money he's spent compared to the other big clubs. Shocking.



He hasn't won anything for six years, I believe. Time must be running out for Wenger.

We haven't won anything for... It's just not that easy to win things. He should have spent on key positions last summer. But how much has the relatively low expenditure in recent seasons been down to the new stadium's expenses? I don't know.... maybe he's just got too stubborn about spending. A dominant central defender and it could have been a lot more interesting this season.
I think they've got money to spend, but Wenger refuses to spend big - or rather, he won't spend more than he thinks a player is worth, especially if that player is a defensive midfielder or a goalkeeper.


Exactly, no trophies in 6 years and he seems too stubborn to change his ways, he only wants to play 1 style of football which is great if you have the players like Barcelona to pull it off, but he just sticks with the same players that let him down all the time and has no plan B when many teams have now found out how to contain Arsenal. It's been obvious for a few years where they need to improve and he has had the money available to him to spend but he just won't spend it.


Six years without a trophy, my heart bleeds bbc laugh.gif

I agree he maybe needs to change his ways slightly, be less stubborn and make a few changes but there is no way on earth they should get rid of him after what he has done. Who would they get in to replace him that would do any better?

If I were them I would flog Fabregas in the summer for £50 million if they can get it, he clearly hasnt wanted to be there 100% for about the last 3 years. Then reinvest part or all of that in 3 or 4 good players and they will be right up their challenging next season.

There's been a lot of talk about them coming in for Chris Samba.
He would certainly beaf up there defence.



Yeah and Samba will be available on a cheapie during the summer. After all, he won't want to be playing in the Championship next season biggrin.gif
Dorty Mag
That's successive relegations from the Premiership with two different clubs for Avram 'Motionless' Grant.

If there is a God, please let the Mackems sack Geordie Steve Bruce and replace him with Avram. Then he can do it three times in three seasons wacko.gif
Big Bad Titus
QUOTE(Dorty Mag @ May 15 2011, 06:52 PM) *

That's successive relegations from the Premiership with two different clubs for Avram 'Motionless' Grant.

If there is a God, please let the Mackems sack Geordie Steve Bruce and replace him with Avram. Then he can do it three times in three seasons wacko.gif


Dont think they need to replace Bruce, he is doing a sterling job laugh.gif
N`LouisNUFC
Grant sacked.
magtillidie
QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ May 15 2011, 06:17 PM) *

Six years without a trophy, my heart bleeds bbc laugh.gif

I agree he maybe needs to change his ways slightly, be less stubborn and make a few changes but there is no way on earth they should get rid of him after what he has done. Who would they get in to replace him that would do any better?

If I were them I would flog Fabregas in the summer for £50 million if they can get it, he clearly hasnt wanted to be there 100% for about the last 3 years. Then reinvest part or all of that in 3 or 4 good players and they will be right up their challenging next season.


How long does a managers success allow a club to let him under perform though, there's no question Wenger has done a fantastic job with Arsenal but the last few years he seems unwilling to try and take the club forward. Maybe there is more to it behind the scenes that Arsenal are just happy to be a top 4 club taking the Champions League money and making a profit and just sitting back and waiting for the wheels to fall off Chelsea, Man Utd & Man City with the new financial rules coming in.

As a neutral it's frustrating to watch Arsenal playing good football but failing to create much in the box, so god knows how the home fans feel having witnessed the results they've had to put up with this season and then be told to stump up a further 6.5% to watch it again next year, they'll soon be getting fed up and I think judging by the empty seats today they maybe already have.
Dorty Mag
QUOTE(N`LouisNUFC @ May 15 2011, 07:50 PM) *

Grant sacked.


bbc laugh.gif
Bruce sackless
Dorty Mag
QUOTE(N`LouisNUFC @ May 15 2011, 07:50 PM) *

Grant sacked.



Useless fuckers, that's four months too late bbc laugh.gif
Big Bad Titus
QUOTE(magtillidie @ May 15 2011, 08:00 PM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ May 15 2011, 06:17 PM) *

Six years without a trophy, my heart bleeds bbc laugh.gif

I agree he maybe needs to change his ways slightly, be less stubborn and make a few changes but there is no way on earth they should get rid of him after what he has done. Who would they get in to replace him that would do any better?

If I were them I would flog Fabregas in the summer for £50 million if they can get it, he clearly hasnt wanted to be there 100% for about the last 3 years. Then reinvest part or all of that in 3 or 4 good players and they will be right up their challenging next season.


How long does a managers success allow a club to let him under perform though, there's no question Wenger has done a fantastic job with Arsenal but the last few years he seems unwilling to try and take the club forward. Maybe there is more to it behind the scenes that Arsenal are just happy to be a top 4 club taking the Champions League money and making a profit and just sitting back and waiting for the wheels to fall off Chelsea, Man Utd & Man City with the new financial rules coming in.

As a neutral it's frustrating to watch Arsenal playing good football but failing to create much in the box, so god knows how the home fans feel having witnessed the results they've had to put up with this season and then be told to stump up a further 6.5% to watch it again next year, they'll soon be getting fed up and I think judging by the empty seats today they maybe already have.


I know what you are saying mate, they can be frustrating to watch but I think the main thing is that whilst they havent won anything for 6 years they are still up there challenging and always qualifying for the Champions League - to get rid of him whilst they are doing that after what he has built there would be a massive massive risk that could really spectacularly backfire.

Lets be honest they are not that far off winning things and its not like they are one of these teams literally just wanting to come 4th. They were in with half decent shout for the league title until not long back and a few results went against them.

Totally agree that Wenger probably needs to change his strategy slightly and spend a bit of cash to add some experienced quality to what he has got but like you say whilst they are consistently qualifying for the CL I dont think its a massive issue from the outside looking in.
The Inspiration
Not a West Ham fan but I'd much rather have seen them stay up than that joke club Wigan. Still, leading 2-0 and losing 3-2 is a bit pathetic... Grant is a joke.
Robert_32
QUOTE(The Inspiration @ May 16 2011, 01:16 AM) *

Not a West Ham fan but I'd much rather have seen them stay up than that joke club Wigan. Still, leading 2-0 and losing 3-2 is a bit pathetic... Grant is a joke.


me 2 (about West-Ham not that i'm a joke biggrin.gif ) but Wigan can still go down wacko.gif
Big Bad Titus
Have to say I lost all respect for West Ham after they taunted Roeder about his brain tumour.

Not a particular fan of Sullivan and Gold either come to think of it.

I quite like Martinez so wouldnt mind seeing Wigan stay up.
magtillidie
QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ May 16 2011, 05:52 PM) *

Have to say I lost all respect for West Ham after they taunted Roeder about his brain tumour.

Not a particular fan of Sullivan and Gold either come to think of it.
I quite like Martinez so wouldnt mind seeing Wigan stay up.


I'd have Ashley in charge any day rather than those 2 inept tossers.
Big Bad Titus
QUOTE(magtillidie @ May 16 2011, 06:03 PM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ May 16 2011, 05:52 PM) *

Have to say I lost all respect for West Ham after they taunted Roeder about his brain tumour.

Not a particular fan of Sullivan and Gold either come to think of it.
I quite like Martinez so wouldnt mind seeing Wigan stay up.


I'd have Ashley in charge any day rather than those 2 inept tossers.


Definitely mate. The whole situation where it looked like Grant had been given the boot but ended up staying (im guessing because the alternative options they were trying to line up turned them down in the end) was where their season just totally fell apart.

Im not a massive fan of Grant as a manager but he wasnt treated very well and the constant comments about players etc from the board just really didnt help matters for them and they have ended up getting what they deserve I think.
Dorty Mag
I have to say I do like the look of Swansea's player of the season Nathan Dyer. He has a big future in the game.
Dembas Strawberry Syrup
Michael Owen on the parade today, I was going to put this up as a caption thingy...until i noticed the ribbons

IPB Image
General Lee Speaking
laugh.gif

Go on. Drop it under the front wheels of the bus you useless cunt.
magtillidie
Like the ribbons
Big Bad Titus
Fair play to him, he's got something now that most scousers dont have and thats a Premier League winners medal happy.gif
The Hunt for Red October
QUOTE(Yellow Dazzla @ May 30 2011, 07:04 PM) *

Michael Owen on the parade today, I was going to put this up as a caption thingy...until i noticed the ribbons

IPB Image




Are watching Stevie G? That's for you silly back pass againts Chelsea the
season before the one just gone.
Big Bad Titus
As if things couldnt get any worse for West Ham fans it seems like they are to be kicked whilst they are down.

As if getting relegated wasnt bad enough it seems like they are gonna get Fat Sam as their new manager bbc laugh.gif
Dembas Strawberry Syrup
QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ May 31 2011, 10:06 PM) *

As if things couldnt get any worse for West Ham fans it seems like they are to be kicked whilst they are down.

As if getting relegated wasnt bad enough it seems like they are gonna get Fat Sam as their new manager bbc laugh.gif

And at a time when the wage bill needs to be dropped, it might need to be raised actually to accomodate the massive backroom team that idiot will be wanting
Big Bad Titus
QUOTE(Yellow Dazzla @ May 31 2011, 10:13 PM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ May 31 2011, 10:06 PM) *

As if things couldnt get any worse for West Ham fans it seems like they are to be kicked whilst they are down.

As if getting relegated wasnt bad enough it seems like they are gonna get Fat Sam as their new manager bbc laugh.gif

And at a time when the wage bill needs to be dropped, it might need to be raised actually to accomodate the massive backroom team that idiot will be wanting


Sure the fans will love his free flowing football too bbc laugh.gif

What a fat useless cunt...
Big Bad Titus
Fat Sam really is delusional bbc laugh.gif

QUOTE
Meanwhile, newly appointed West Ham manager Sam Allardyce hopes that any change of ownership does not impact on him, as it has done in the past.

"My information, having spoken to David Sullivan, was that he did not want to sell West Ham football club, because it is his club," Allardyce told Sky Sports News. "It is the club he has always supported.

"That was one of the reasons why I took the job, because I didn't want any fractions in terms of change of ownership.

"My reputation has already suffered wrongly by new ownerships at Newcastle and Blackburn dispensing of my services when there was no real credibility in that other than the fact that they were new owners and didn't want me.

"It wasn't down to results, it wasn't down to the way I have performed as a manager, so, if that's the case and that materialises then obviously I am surprised at that."


Trust me Sam, it was down to results and the way you performed as a manager happy.gif
Alan Shearers Throbbing Crotch
QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ Jun 3 2011, 11:51 AM) *

Fat Sam really is delusional bbc laugh.gif

QUOTE
Meanwhile, newly appointed West Ham manager Sam Allardyce hopes that any change of ownership does not impact on him, as it has done in the past.

"My information, having spoken to David Sullivan, was that he did not want to sell West Ham football club, because it is his club," Allardyce told Sky Sports News. "It is the club he has always supported.

"That was one of the reasons why I took the job, because I didn't want any fractions in terms of change of ownership.

"My reputation has already suffered wrongly by new ownerships at Newcastle and Blackburn dispensing of my services when there was no real credibility in that other than the fact that they were new owners and didn't want me.

"It wasn't down to results, it wasn't down to the way I have performed as a manager, so, if that's the case and that materialises then obviously I am surprised at that."


Trust me Sam, it was down to results and the way you performed as a manager happy.gif


That's funny, I'm sure he had the best start to a Premier League season since Keegan for us. It was entirely down to new ownership. The football wasn't great and the results went slightly down hill but it wasn't 'sacking form'. I think we were still 11th when he got sacked.
clinton_baptiste
QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ May 31 2011, 10:06 PM) *

As if things couldnt get any worse for West Ham fans it seems like they are to be kicked whilst they are down.

As if getting relegated wasnt bad enough it seems like they are gonna get Fat Sam as their new manager bbc laugh.gif


You would think things couldn't get any worse, but following his appointment, who does he want to bring to the club as one of his first signings.......?

None other than Spit the Diouf
roll.gif roll.gif roll.gif
Alan Shearers Throbbing Crotch
QUOTE(clinton_baptiste @ Jun 3 2011, 12:04 PM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ May 31 2011, 10:06 PM) *

As if things couldnt get any worse for West Ham fans it seems like they are to be kicked whilst they are down.

As if getting relegated wasnt bad enough it seems like they are gonna get Fat Sam as their new manager bbc laugh.gif


You would think things couldn't get any worse, but following his appointment, who does he want to bring to the club as one of his first signings.......?

None other than Spit the Diouf
roll.gif roll.gif roll.gif


I don't really understand how it's funny blink.gif I reckon he'd go well for them. He did great with Bolton and with West Ham a similar type side he'd probably get them up. Plus Diouf would be a great player in the Championship even if he is a knob.
Big Bad Titus
QUOTE(Alan Shearers Throbbing Crotch @ Jun 3 2011, 11:59 AM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ Jun 3 2011, 11:51 AM) *

Fat Sam really is delusional bbc laugh.gif

QUOTE
Meanwhile, newly appointed West Ham manager Sam Allardyce hopes that any change of ownership does not impact on him, as it has done in the past.

"My information, having spoken to David Sullivan, was that he did not want to sell West Ham football club, because it is his club," Allardyce told Sky Sports News. "It is the club he has always supported.

"That was one of the reasons why I took the job, because I didn't want any fractions in terms of change of ownership.

"My reputation has already suffered wrongly by new ownerships at Newcastle and Blackburn dispensing of my services when there was no real credibility in that other than the fact that they were new owners and didn't want me.

"It wasn't down to results, it wasn't down to the way I have performed as a manager, so, if that's the case and that materialises then obviously I am surprised at that."


Trust me Sam, it was down to results and the way you performed as a manager happy.gif


That's funny, I'm sure he had the best start to a Premier League season since Keegan for us. It was entirely down to new ownership. The football wasn't great and the results went slightly down hill but it wasn't 'sacking form'. I think we were still 11th when he got sacked.


I think you must have been watching a different team mate.

If he had been doing well then im pretty sure that even Ashley wouldnt have gone through the expense and hassle of sacking him. If it was a case of Ashley simply wanting his own man in then he would have sacked him straight away. He was given his chance to prove himself and failed and dont let a few decent results at the start of the season fool you otherwise.

We were playing awful percentage football that wasn't getting results and was rightly sacked for me. Don't think ive ever heard a manager spout so much self absorbed shite as he does.

Think he will do well at West Ham like because he is a great manager if all you want is shite mediocrity bordering on poor which is pretty much them to a tee.
Exiled Toon
QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ Jun 3 2011, 01:43 PM) *

QUOTE(Alan Shearers Throbbing Crotch @ Jun 3 2011, 11:59 AM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ Jun 3 2011, 11:51 AM) *

Fat Sam really is delusional bbc laugh.gif

QUOTE
Meanwhile, newly appointed West Ham manager Sam Allardyce hopes that any change of ownership does not impact on him, as it has done in the past.

"My information, having spoken to David Sullivan, was that he did not want to sell West Ham football club, because it is his club," Allardyce told Sky Sports News. "It is the club he has always supported.

"That was one of the reasons why I took the job, because I didn't want any fractions in terms of change of ownership.

"My reputation has already suffered wrongly by new ownerships at Newcastle and Blackburn dispensing of my services when there was no real credibility in that other than the fact that they were new owners and didn't want me.

"It wasn't down to results, it wasn't down to the way I have performed as a manager, so, if that's the case and that materialises then obviously I am surprised at that."


Trust me Sam, it was down to results and the way you performed as a manager happy.gif


That's funny, I'm sure he had the best start to a Premier League season since Keegan for us. It was entirely down to new ownership. The football wasn't great and the results went slightly down hill but it wasn't 'sacking form'. I think we were still 11th when he got sacked.


I think you must have been watching a different team mate.

If he had been doing well then im pretty sure that even Ashley wouldnt have gone through the expense and hassle of sacking him. If it was a case of Ashley simply wanting his own man in then he would have sacked him straight away. He was given his chance to prove himself and failed and dont let a few decent results at the start of the season fool you otherwise.

We were playing awful percentage football that wasn't getting results and was rightly sacked for me. Don't think ive ever heard a manager spout so much self absorbed shite as he does.

Think he will do well at West Ham like because he is a great manager if all you want is shite mediocrity bordering on poor which is pretty much them to a tee.


I remember his interview after losing to Derby (who were relegated with 10 points), where he said that he thought that we had done enough to contain Derby doh.gif

Talk about a lack of ambition
Alan Shearers Throbbing Crotch
QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ Jun 3 2011, 01:43 PM) *

QUOTE(Alan Shearers Throbbing Crotch @ Jun 3 2011, 11:59 AM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ Jun 3 2011, 11:51 AM) *

Fat Sam really is delusional bbc laugh.gif

QUOTE
Meanwhile, newly appointed West Ham manager Sam Allardyce hopes that any change of ownership does not impact on him, as it has done in the past.

"My information, having spoken to David Sullivan, was that he did not want to sell West Ham football club, because it is his club," Allardyce told Sky Sports News. "It is the club he has always supported.

"That was one of the reasons why I took the job, because I didn't want any fractions in terms of change of ownership.

"My reputation has already suffered wrongly by new ownerships at Newcastle and Blackburn dispensing of my services when there was no real credibility in that other than the fact that they were new owners and didn't want me.

"It wasn't down to results, it wasn't down to the way I have performed as a manager, so, if that's the case and that materialises then obviously I am surprised at that."


Trust me Sam, it was down to results and the way you performed as a manager happy.gif


That's funny, I'm sure he had the best start to a Premier League season since Keegan for us. It was entirely down to new ownership. The football wasn't great and the results went slightly down hill but it wasn't 'sacking form'. I think we were still 11th when he got sacked.


I think you must have been watching a different team mate.

If he had been doing well then im pretty sure that even Ashley wouldnt have gone through the expense and hassle of sacking him. If it was a case of Ashley simply wanting his own man in then he would have sacked him straight away. He was given his chance to prove himself and failed and dont let a few decent results at the start of the season fool you otherwise.

We were playing awful percentage football that wasn't getting results and was rightly sacked for me. Don't think ive ever heard a manager spout so much self absorbed shite as he does.

Think he will do well at West Ham like because he is a great manager if all you want is shite mediocrity bordering on poor which is pretty much them to a tee.


I wasn't. I don't like the guy either and never wanted him but we had a good start. It was everything about him wanting a different man. The team barely had time to gel and if he was kept on I reckon we could have had a couple of decent seasons. I don't see how he was expected to leave his mark on us in such a short space of time. I seriously doubt he'd have got relegated and face it, the club was in freefall anyway. I think managers need time, exactly like players need to settle in.
Big Bad Titus
QUOTE(Exiled Toon @ Jun 3 2011, 03:04 PM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ Jun 3 2011, 01:43 PM) *

QUOTE(Alan Shearers Throbbing Crotch @ Jun 3 2011, 11:59 AM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ Jun 3 2011, 11:51 AM) *

Fat Sam really is delusional bbc laugh.gif

QUOTE
Meanwhile, newly appointed West Ham manager Sam Allardyce hopes that any change of ownership does not impact on him, as it has done in the past.

"My information, having spoken to David Sullivan, was that he did not want to sell West Ham football club, because it is his club," Allardyce told Sky Sports News. "It is the club he has always supported.

"That was one of the reasons why I took the job, because I didn't want any fractions in terms of change of ownership.

"My reputation has already suffered wrongly by new ownerships at Newcastle and Blackburn dispensing of my services when there was no real credibility in that other than the fact that they were new owners and didn't want me.

"It wasn't down to results, it wasn't down to the way I have performed as a manager, so, if that's the case and that materialises then obviously I am surprised at that."


Trust me Sam, it was down to results and the way you performed as a manager happy.gif


That's funny, I'm sure he had the best start to a Premier League season since Keegan for us. It was entirely down to new ownership. The football wasn't great and the results went slightly down hill but it wasn't 'sacking form'. I think we were still 11th when he got sacked.


I think you must have been watching a different team mate.

If he had been doing well then im pretty sure that even Ashley wouldnt have gone through the expense and hassle of sacking him. If it was a case of Ashley simply wanting his own man in then he would have sacked him straight away. He was given his chance to prove himself and failed and dont let a few decent results at the start of the season fool you otherwise.

We were playing awful percentage football that wasn't getting results and was rightly sacked for me. Don't think ive ever heard a manager spout so much self absorbed shite as he does.

Think he will do well at West Ham like because he is a great manager if all you want is shite mediocrity bordering on poor which is pretty much them to a tee.


I remember his interview after losing to Derby (who were relegated with 10 points), where he said that he thought that we had done enough to contain Derby doh.gif

Talk about a lack of ambition


Aye - the fact that 4 of those points came from us (and it only wasnt 6 due to a last minute equaliser) sums up all you need to know about him and how he had us playing.
Big Bad Titus
QUOTE(Alan Shearers Throbbing Crotch @ Jun 3 2011, 03:21 PM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ Jun 3 2011, 01:43 PM) *

QUOTE(Alan Shearers Throbbing Crotch @ Jun 3 2011, 11:59 AM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ Jun 3 2011, 11:51 AM) *

Fat Sam really is delusional bbc laugh.gif

QUOTE
Meanwhile, newly appointed West Ham manager Sam Allardyce hopes that any change of ownership does not impact on him, as it has done in the past.

"My information, having spoken to David Sullivan, was that he did not want to sell West Ham football club, because it is his club," Allardyce told Sky Sports News. "It is the club he has always supported.

"That was one of the reasons why I took the job, because I didn't want any fractions in terms of change of ownership.

"My reputation has already suffered wrongly by new ownerships at Newcastle and Blackburn dispensing of my services when there was no real credibility in that other than the fact that they were new owners and didn't want me.

"It wasn't down to results, it wasn't down to the way I have performed as a manager, so, if that's the case and that materialises then obviously I am surprised at that."


Trust me Sam, it was down to results and the way you performed as a manager happy.gif


That's funny, I'm sure he had the best start to a Premier League season since Keegan for us. It was entirely down to new ownership. The football wasn't great and the results went slightly down hill but it wasn't 'sacking form'. I think we were still 11th when he got sacked.


I think you must have been watching a different team mate.

If he had been doing well then im pretty sure that even Ashley wouldnt have gone through the expense and hassle of sacking him. If it was a case of Ashley simply wanting his own man in then he would have sacked him straight away. He was given his chance to prove himself and failed and dont let a few decent results at the start of the season fool you otherwise.

We were playing awful percentage football that wasn't getting results and was rightly sacked for me. Don't think ive ever heard a manager spout so much self absorbed shite as he does.

Think he will do well at West Ham like because he is a great manager if all you want is shite mediocrity bordering on poor which is pretty much them to a tee.


I wasn't. I don't like the guy either and never wanted him but we had a good start. It was everything about him wanting a different man. The team barely had time to gel and if he was kept on I reckon we could have had a couple of decent seasons. I don't see how he was expected to leave his mark on us in such a short space of time. I seriously doubt he'd have got relegated and face it, the club was in freefall anyway. I think managers need time, exactly like players need to settle in.


He left a pretty decent mark in such a short space of time, unfortunately it was more like a skid mark laugh.gif
Exiled Toon
QUOTE(Alan Shearers Throbbing Crotch @ Jun 3 2011, 03:21 PM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ Jun 3 2011, 01:43 PM) *

QUOTE(Alan Shearers Throbbing Crotch @ Jun 3 2011, 11:59 AM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ Jun 3 2011, 11:51 AM) *

Fat Sam really is delusional bbc laugh.gif

QUOTE
Meanwhile, newly appointed West Ham manager Sam Allardyce hopes that any change of ownership does not impact on him, as it has done in the past.

"My information, having spoken to David Sullivan, was that he did not want to sell West Ham football club, because it is his club," Allardyce told Sky Sports News. "It is the club he has always supported.

"That was one of the reasons why I took the job, because I didn't want any fractions in terms of change of ownership.

"My reputation has already suffered wrongly by new ownerships at Newcastle and Blackburn dispensing of my services when there was no real credibility in that other than the fact that they were new owners and didn't want me.

"It wasn't down to results, it wasn't down to the way I have performed as a manager, so, if that's the case and that materialises then obviously I am surprised at that."


Trust me Sam, it was down to results and the way you performed as a manager happy.gif


That's funny, I'm sure he had the best start to a Premier League season since Keegan for us. It was entirely down to new ownership. The football wasn't great and the results went slightly down hill but it wasn't 'sacking form'. I think we were still 11th when he got sacked.


I think you must have been watching a different team mate.

If he had been doing well then im pretty sure that even Ashley wouldnt have gone through the expense and hassle of sacking him. If it was a case of Ashley simply wanting his own man in then he would have sacked him straight away. He was given his chance to prove himself and failed and dont let a few decent results at the start of the season fool you otherwise.

We were playing awful percentage football that wasn't getting results and was rightly sacked for me. Don't think ive ever heard a manager spout so much self absorbed shite as he does.

Think he will do well at West Ham like because he is a great manager if all you want is shite mediocrity bordering on poor which is pretty much them to a tee.


I wasn't. I don't like the guy either and never wanted him but we had a good start. It was everything about him wanting a different man. The team barely had time to gel and if he was kept on I reckon we could have had a couple of decent seasons. I don't see how he was expected to leave his mark on us in such a short space of time. I seriously doubt he'd have got relegated and face it, the club was in freefall anyway. I think managers need time, exactly like players need to settle in.


Graeme Souness made a good start. Enough said!
Alan Shearers Throbbing Crotch
QUOTE(Exiled Toon @ Jun 3 2011, 05:49 PM) *

QUOTE(Alan Shearers Throbbing Crotch @ Jun 3 2011, 03:21 PM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ Jun 3 2011, 01:43 PM) *

QUOTE(Alan Shearers Throbbing Crotch @ Jun 3 2011, 11:59 AM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ Jun 3 2011, 11:51 AM) *

Fat Sam really is delusional bbc laugh.gif

QUOTE
Meanwhile, newly appointed West Ham manager Sam Allardyce hopes that any change of ownership does not impact on him, as it has done in the past.

"My information, having spoken to David Sullivan, was that he did not want to sell West Ham football club, because it is his club," Allardyce told Sky Sports News. "It is the club he has always supported.

"That was one of the reasons why I took the job, because I didn't want any fractions in terms of change of ownership.

"My reputation has already suffered wrongly by new ownerships at Newcastle and Blackburn dispensing of my services when there was no real credibility in that other than the fact that they were new owners and didn't want me.

"It wasn't down to results, it wasn't down to the way I have performed as a manager, so, if that's the case and that materialises then obviously I am surprised at that."


Trust me Sam, it was down to results and the way you performed as a manager happy.gif


That's funny, I'm sure he had the best start to a Premier League season since Keegan for us. It was entirely down to new ownership. The football wasn't great and the results went slightly down hill but it wasn't 'sacking form'. I think we were still 11th when he got sacked.


I think you must have been watching a different team mate.

If he had been doing well then im pretty sure that even Ashley wouldnt have gone through the expense and hassle of sacking him. If it was a case of Ashley simply wanting his own man in then he would have sacked him straight away. He was given his chance to prove himself and failed and dont let a few decent results at the start of the season fool you otherwise.

We were playing awful percentage football that wasn't getting results and was rightly sacked for me. Don't think ive ever heard a manager spout so much self absorbed shite as he does.

Think he will do well at West Ham like because he is a great manager if all you want is shite mediocrity bordering on poor which is pretty much them to a tee.


I wasn't. I don't like the guy either and never wanted him but we had a good start. It was everything about him wanting a different man. The team barely had time to gel and if he was kept on I reckon we could have had a couple of decent seasons. I don't see how he was expected to leave his mark on us in such a short space of time. I seriously doubt he'd have got relegated and face it, the club was in freefall anyway. I think managers need time, exactly like players need to settle in.


Graeme Souness made a good start. Enough said!


He had a little bit longer than Allardyce, ET. People that keep screaming for managers heads within 6 months are exactly the reason we're doing shite now.
I'll reiterate that I never wanted Allardyce here before people think I did. I'm just saying he didn't get enough time. And people like Souness had too much time.
The Hunt for Red October
Allardyce sometimes sounds like he is depressed.
Dembas Strawberry Syrup
QUOTE(The hunt for Red October @ Jun 3 2011, 10:07 PM) *

Allardyce sometimes sounds like he is depressed.

Just like normal then laugh.gif
Big Bad Titus
QUOTE(Alan Shearers Throbbing Crotch @ Jun 3 2011, 09:31 PM) *

QUOTE(Exiled Toon @ Jun 3 2011, 05:49 PM) *

QUOTE(Alan Shearers Throbbing Crotch @ Jun 3 2011, 03:21 PM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ Jun 3 2011, 01:43 PM) *

QUOTE(Alan Shearers Throbbing Crotch @ Jun 3 2011, 11:59 AM) *

QUOTE(Big Bad Titus @ Jun 3 2011, 11:51 AM) *

Fat Sam really is delusional bbc laugh.gif

QUOTE
Meanwhile, newly appointed West Ham manager Sam Allardyce hopes that any change of ownership does not impact on him, as it has done in the past.

"My information, having spoken to David Sullivan, was that he did not want to sell West Ham football club, because it is his club," Allardyce told Sky Sports News. "It is the club he has always supported.

"That was one of the reasons why I took the job, because I didn't want any fractions in terms of change of ownership.

"My reputation has already suffered wrongly by new ownerships at Newcastle and Blackburn dispensing of my services when there was no real credibility in that other than the fact that they were new owners and didn't want me.

"It wasn't down to results, it wasn't down to the way I have performed as a manager, so, if that's the case and that materialises then obviously I am surprised at that."


Trust me Sam, it was down to results and the way you performed as a manager happy.gif


That's funny, I'm sure he had the best start to a Premier League season since Keegan for us. It was entirely down to new ownership. The football wasn't great and the results went slightly down hill but it wasn't 'sacking form'. I think we were still 11th when he got sacked.


I think you must have been watching a different team mate.

If he had been doing well then im pretty sure that even Ashley wouldnt have gone through the expense and hassle of sacking him. If it was a case of Ashley simply wanting his own man in then he would have sacked him straight away. He was given his chance to prove himself and failed and dont let a few decent results at the start of the season fool you otherwise.

We were playing awful percentage football that wasn't getting results and was rightly sacked for me. Don't think ive ever heard a manager spout so much self absorbed shite as he does.

Think he will do well at West Ham like because he is a great manager if all you want is shite mediocrity bordering on poor which is pretty much them to a tee.


I wasn't. I don't like the guy either and never wanted him but we had a good start. It was everything about him wanting a different man. The team barely had time to gel and if he was kept on I reckon we could have had a couple of decent seasons. I don't see how he was expected to leave his mark on us in such a short space of time. I seriously doubt he'd have got relegated and face it, the club was in freefall anyway. I think managers need time, exactly like players need to settle in.


Graeme Souness made a good start. Enough said!


He had a little bit longer than Allardyce, ET. People that keep screaming for managers heads within 6 months are exactly the reason we're doing shite now.
I'll reiterate that I never wanted Allardyce here before people think I did. I'm just saying he didn't get enough time. And people like Souness had too much time.


People seem to get obsessed with giving managers time automatically just because of the likes of Fergie at Man U. Im all for it as continuity is obviously a good thing to have where possible but ive said it before and ill say it again there is no point giving someone time when you can clearly see things are bad and unlikely to improve.

If the team is doing shite yet you can still see a few positives and its maybe a case of possibly going a couple of steps back to go forward then thats fine but for me there was never going to be any way forward with Allardyce's "containment" football where he thought more about what the opposition were going to do than his own team.

I was actually pleased when we got him as I thought he would be intelligent enough to take the good parts from Bolton such as the organisation and defensive tightness etc but be able to mix that with the better quality of attacking players we had and play some effective football. Instead he just tried to turn us into Bolton and unsurprisingly it didnt work.

Rather than not been given enough time id seen more than enough in 24 games under him to be able to suggest he had had more time than he should have. One of the best decisions Ashley has made getting shot of him, its just a shame it cost us a fortune due to his ridiculous backroom team and mostly shite signings.

You trying to tell me that given more time under Sam the likes of Casapa, Smith and Geremi would have turned into good players??

Utter fucking waste of space that guy, well and truely on a par with the likes of Souness, Gullit and Dalglish.
General Lee Speaking
Sorry Throbbing Crotch but your just wrong about Allardyce. He was making such fundamental errors in trying to play a style of football that didn't suit the players but he was the only one who couldn't see that. He signed dud after dud despite his wonderful backroom set up. Everything that came out of his mouth was pure shite and he was exposed for the charlatan he truely is. Did you not see the Portsmouth and Liverpool home games?
Big Bad Titus
QUOTE(General Lee Speaking @ Jun 3 2011, 11:44 PM) *

Sorry Throbbing Crotch but your just wrong about Allardyce. He was making such fundamental errors in trying to play a style of football that didn't suit the players but he was the only one who couldn't see that. He signed dud after dud despite his wonderful backroom set up. Everything that came out of his mouth was pure shite and he was exposed for the charlatan he truely is. Did you not see the Portsmouth and Liverpool home games?


wacko.gif
supaslik
QUOTE(General Lee Speaking @ Jun 3 2011, 10:44 PM) *

Sorry Throbbing Crotch but your just wrong about Allardyce. He was making such fundamental errors in trying to play a style of football that didn't suit the players but he was the only one who couldn't see that. He signed dud after dud despite his wonderful backroom set up. Everything that came out of his mouth was pure shite and he was exposed for the charlatan he truely is. Did you not see the Portsmouth and Liverpool home games?


To be fair, he did bring Beye and Enrique in. On the other hand he also bought Smith, Rozenhal and Cacapa so kind of leans in the favour of poor business blush.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.