With a hooker.

Hahaha, English football is a total joke, is there not 1 player who can keep his dick in his pants?

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/94385...old-hooker.html

Thats Terry, Gerrard, Crouch, that little cunt Ashley Cole and now Rooney.

Wonder who is next?

Well Rooney would have to pay for it, the ugly cunt!

Tbf I've found most men can't keep it in their pants. I'm sure that's not the case for the members of this board though

I'm not defending the fat ugly kent but reading that article there seems no proof at all to it (good old NOTW). Any slut could make that story up and make some cash, it doesn't mean it happened, although I wouldn't be surprised if it did.

At least it wasn't a granny this time.

I hate newspapers.

well recovered.

well recovered.

I like how she seems to make out Rooney's the only guilty party in this, by going on about his wife was pregnant and he seemed not to care, despite the fact she allegedly chose to have sex with him and then sell it to the NOTW.

You do know how prostitution works?

The buyer has to be willing to pay in the first instance...or do you imagine there are gangs of call girls raping footballers then demanding money from them completlely against their will?

According to the story, Rooney phoned the agency for a girl. Its not like he's had an affair with some random bird from a club etc...it was a business transaction intitated by the buyer i.e. Rooney himself. Theres a market out there for call girls, and as a married family man Rooney shouldnt really be part of it...its what seperates us from the apes.

I think the likes of him and Terry were convinced they could gag the press by using their vast wealth to bend the law in their favour....think again lads, its about the only thing or person you cant buy off. In saying all that, footballers are private citizens and as such are entitled to privacy as much as anyone...its not as if they are in public office or use public money like MPs who are rightly held to book when they step out of line. "But thats the price they pay for earning millions etc" I hear some cry, especially those who gain most from our relaxed privacy laws...those self appointed guardians of our country's moral code the print media...who think nothing of spying or hacking into mobile phone calls of absoloutley anyone they choose if they think there is a personal story they can exploit for cash.....so much for morality

Oh no, footballer in being a dick head shocker!!

To be honest I dont really care although id have to say she is definitely fitter than Colleen

Best quote in there for me "As a woman, I wouldn't like that done to me - especially if I was pregnant." Obviously £1200 a time soon makes you forget those morals though love eh?

I do know how prostitution works. Doesn't mean she should be sleeping with Rooney though, whether he's approaching her or not. Of course Rooney is the one who is cheating and it's disgraceful behaviour if true. There isn't any evidence it is though, mind you.

That wouldnt actually suprise me to be fair

So Prostitutes should only sleep with single men who are not famous? How do they check that? Do they ask for a sworn affidavit that they are single? Do they get them to swear on tape that they are not married?? Get real.

She was selling sex, Rooney wanted some so she obliged. It was a business transaction for her. Supply and demand. Rooney is the only one to blame here. He should not have done it.

So you think a woman who equates sex with money as a basic fact of life is going to turn down a multimillionaire footballer?.....okaaaaay.....

And we don't know if its the truth, thats right....but the fact he paid an expensive team of lawyers to try to stop the paper from printing the allegtions might give us a big clue as to whether it was or not

That post must have been written by two different people.

Presumably, Jennifer Thompson was well paid for her story - because I can't see her continuing in her chosen 'profession'. There can't be too many of her clients who want their names made public

She's lost my business now, I'm not sticking my cock where Rooney's been!

There can't be too many of her colleagues who would want their names made public either!

If he hadn't been so cheap he might have got a discreet girl

After all, he's probably blown about 50k in lawyers' fees trying to injunct the story

There's a moral here somewhere........

An escort will spend the night with you for £1200 or so, while a solicitor will want £50,000 before he fucks you up the arse

I'm just guessing at what he might have spent.

When I was in the UK it would have cost about 5k to 7k for me to do a simple injunction that wasn't particularly opposed, doing the Court hearing myself.

Rooney will be using expensive London solicitors (with hourly rates double what mine were) and he will also have a QC on board, and it's for sure News International will have fought tooth and nail. Also, having lost, Rooney probably has to pick up News International's legal bill too.

So actually, it's probably more like 100k +

Still he can afford it, and wigs don't come cheap

The Thai news reporting on it

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLaJzjj6uEY...player_embedded

Like the part when shes doing the Sudoku

The Everton fans had a good one lined up for the weekend:

No woman, no Kai

to the tune of No Woman, No Cry.

Thats pretty fucken funny really, it gets no better for the prick, Rangers will give him as much stick as Everton would, then its Liverpool on Sunday.

He must be sick of his life at the minute.

No sympathy for Shrek whatsoever but have to say the people pissing me off most in all of this are the money grabbing whores with all these tabloid exclusives saying how sorry they are for Colleen etc etc.

Im guessing they dont feel bad enough to not get paid for all of these interviews and exclusives??

This country is just full of money grabbing, celebrity hungry fucking scum.

They may as well say "yes I feel sorry for Coleen but Im not saying no to a shitload of money to tell everyone"

Bunch of hypocritical bitches the lot of them

So the organisations offering the money have no moral responsibilty for "kiss n tell" stories?

If Rooney is entirely to blame because he paid for sex, surely the papers who have paid these prostitutes are acting in much the same way?...its the business transaction again, you need a vendor and a buyer for this to work.

Stupid and immoral young women are one thing, Rupert Murdoch's willingness to pay money to them is much the same thing if you ask me.

Indeed, both scum quite frankly. Though we all knew the NOTW is pathetic anyway.

That said, does anyone feel that sad they revealed this story as opposed to allowing the people involved some privacy? After all, it revolves around arguably England's best footballer and his wife, who also happens to be pretty famous.

True, the papers dont give a shit if it ruins lives just as long as it sells newspapers.